Proposta de construção de indicador de caracterização da acessibilidade na região metropolitana de Fortaleza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v26i4.1546Keywords:
Acessibilidade, Escolha Discreta, Logsum, Indicador, Caracterização.Abstract
A compreensão da problemática é essencial na construção de soluções adequadas aos problemas de mobilidade e acessibilidade urbanas. Assim, indicadores que possam caracterizar e diagnosticar estes problemas devem ser melhor investigados. Este trabalho propõe um indicador de caracterização da acessibilidade com base no logsum, comumente utilizado como medida do excedente do consumidor, apresentando características que favorecem seu uso como medida de desempenho do sistema de transportes. Para propor o indicador, utiliza-se como referência uma representação geral da problemática da mobilidade e acessibilidade e uma tipologia de problemas baseada nos princípios da equidade e sustentabilidade, verificando sua aplicabilidade na Região Metropolitana de Fortaleza. Conclui-se que o método proposto permite a estimativa de indicadores adequados para analisar problemas de acessibilidade desde que no cálculo do logsum ponderado, bem como na definição e calibração das funções utilidade, sejam consideradas as especificidades de cada tipo de problema que se pretende caracterizar e diagnosticar.
Downloads
References
ARCE, e Concremat. (2013) Atualização da base de dados georreferenciados do STIP-CE. Fortaleza, CE.
ASTEF (2006) Pesquisa de Identificação dos Usuários da Alternativa de Implantação dos Trechos Vila das Flores / Couto Fernandes (Sistema Elétrico) e Couto Fernandes / João Felipe (Sistema Diesel) Integrantes da Linha Sul do Metrofor. Associação Técnico-Cientifica Eng. Paulo de Frontin. Fortaleza.
Ben-Akiva, M. E.; e Lerman, S. R. (1979) Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. D. A. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds), Behavioural Travel Modelling. Croom Helm.
Bhat, C. R.; Kockelman, K. M.; Chen, Q.; Handy, S.; Mahmassani, H. S.; e Weston, L. (2015) Urban accessibility index: Literature review. Texas Department of Transportation. Austin, TX. Disponível em: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/14882
Börjesson, M.; Jonsson, R. D.; Berglund, S.; e Almström, P. (2014) Land-use impacts in transport appraisal. Research in Transportation Economics, 47(1), 82–91. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.021
Caliper. (2007) Transcad 5.0 User´s guide. Caliper Corporation.
Cascetta, E. (2009) Transportation systems analysis: models and applications. (2a.). Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2
Cascetta, E.; Cartenì, A.; e Montanino, M. (2013) A new measure of accessibility based on perceived opportunities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 87, 117–132. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.598
de Jong, G.; Daly, A.; Pieters, M.; e van der Hoorn, T. (2007) The logsum as an evaluation measure: Review of the literature and new results. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(9 SPEC. ISS.), 874–889. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.10.002
De Jong, G.; Pieters, M.; Daly, A.; Graafland, I.; Kroes, E.; e Koopmans, C. (2005) Using the logsum as an evaluation measure: literature and case study. Calif.: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica. Disponível em: http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR275.html
De la Barra, T. (1989) Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Dong, X.; Ben-akiva, M. E.; Bowman, J. L.; e Walker, J. L. (2006) Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A, 40, 163–180. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002
Garcia, C. S. H. F. (2016) Strategic assessment of accessibility on urban mobility networks. Universidade de Lisboa.
Garcia, C. S. H. F.; Macário, M. D. R. M. R.; Menezes, E. D. D. A. G.; e Loureiro, C. F. G. (2018) Strategic Assessment of Lisbon’s Accessibility and Mobility Problems from an Equity Perspective. Networks and Spatial Economics, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11067-018-9391-4
Geurs, K.; e van Wee, Bert. (2013) Accessibility: perspectives, measures and applications. van Wee, B.; Annema, J. A.; e Banister, D. (Eds), The transport system and transport policy: an introduction (p. 399). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Northampton, Massachusetts.
Geurs, K. T.; e van Eck, J. R. (2001) Accessibility measures: review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. RIVM Report, 787, 1–265. Disponível em: https://rivm.openrepository.com/rivm/handle/10029/9487
Geurs, K. T.; e van Wee, B. (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
Geurs, K. T.; Zondag, B.; De Jong, G.; e De Bok, M. (2010) Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 15(7), 382–393. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
Greene, W. H.; e Hensher, D. A. (2010) Modeling ordered choices: a primer. Cambridge University Press.
Handy, S. L.; e Niemeier, D. A. (1997) Measuring accessibility : an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29, 1175–1194. doi: 10.1068/a291175
Koening, J. G. (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation, 9. doi: 10.1007/BF00167128
Kohli, S.; e Daly, A. (2006) The use of logsums in welfare estimation: application in PRISM.
Lopes, A. S.; Loureiro, C. F. G.; e Van Wee, B. (2018) LUTI operational models review based on the proposition of an a priori ALUTI conceptual model. Transport Reviews, 0(0), 1–22. doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1442890
McFadden, D. (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, & J. W. Weibull (Eds), Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location. North Holland, Amsterdam.
Meyer, M. D.; e Miller, E. J. (2001) Urban transportation planning: a decision-oriented approach. (2a.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York.
Miller, E. J. (2009) Integrated Urban Models: Theoretical Prospects, invited resource paper. Kitamura, R.; Yoshii, T.; e Yamamoto, T. (Eds), The Expanding Sphere of Travel Behaviour Research: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (p. 351–384). Emerald, Bingley, UK.
Niemeier, D. A. (1997) Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation, 24, 377–396. doi:10.1023/a:1004914803019
Papa, E.; Silva, C.; Te Brömmelstroet, M.; e Hull, A. (2015) Accessibility instruments for planning practice: a review of European experiences. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(January). doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.585
Small, K. A.; e Rosen, H. S. (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica, 49(1), 105–130. doi:10.2307/1911129
Small, K. A.; e Verhoef, E. T. (2007) The economics of urban transportation. (1a.). Routledge, New York.
Soares, F. D. P.; Loureiro, C. F. G.; e Miller, E. J. (2018) Diagnosis: A Problem-Oriented Approach to Urban Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting. Washington DC.
Train, K. E. (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. (2a ed). Cambridge University Press.
van Wee, B. (2016) Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
Williams, H. C. W. L. (1977) On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A, 9(3), 285–344. doi:10.1068/a090285
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
- Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
- Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
