Uma estratégia para avaliação da resiliência na mobilidade urbana

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v26i3.1625

Keywords:

Resilience, Urban Mobility, Motorized Vehicles, Active Modes, Fossil Fuels.

Abstract

This study aims at the development of a strategy, which is based on the assumption that motorized modes would not be available, for evaluating the resilience of urban mobility. Therefore, only walking and cycling were considered as urban transport modes for the purpose of this theoretical exercise. The trips were initially classified in two groups, according to their adaptability or transformability. Those in the first group are considered resilient trips, but a third category had to be created to represent another set of resilient trips. These are the exceptional trips, i.e. walking or cycling trips that are longer than the Maximum Possible Distances (MPD) defined for the evaluation of resilience. The worst scenario (0 km) presented 40.4% of resilience, while the maximum resilience (100%) was achieved in 12,5 km. It was possible then, to adjust a theoretical function to represent the variation of the resilience. The results also showed a pattern for each segment of resilience due to differences in the urban form.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bohannon, R.W. (1997) Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and deter-minants. Age and Ageing, v. 26, p. 15-19. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.15.

Brunner, A. (2013) The effects of urban sprawl on daily life: Smart growth implementation of Atlantic Stations. Transporta-tion Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. Disponível em: <https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1241313>. (Acesso em: 22/01/2017)

Buehler, R.; J. Pucher; D. Merom e A. Bauman (2011) Active travel in Germany and the U.S. contributions of daily walking and cycling to physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, v. 41, n. 3, p. 241-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.012

Dantas, A.; S. Page e S. Krumdieck (2010) Urban form and long-term fuel supply decline: A method to investigate the peak oil risks to essential activities. Transportation Research, Part A, n. 44, p. 306-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.002

Exner, A.; E. Politti; E. Schriefl; S. Erker; R. Stangl; S. Baud; H. Warmuth; J. Matzenberger; L. Kranzl; R. Paulesich; M. Windha-ber; S. Supper e G. Stöglehner (2016) Measuring regional resilience towards fossil fuel supply constraints. Adaptability and vulnerability in socio-ecological transformations: The case of Austria. Energy Policy, v. 91, p. 128-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.031

Fernandes, V. A.; R. Rothfuss; V. Hochschild; W. R da Silva e M. P. S. Santos (2015) Resiliência da mobilidade urbana: Uma proposta conceitual. Anais do XXIX Congresso Nacional de Pesquisa em Transporte da ANPET. Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil, p. 2759-2770. Disponível em: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307456170_Resiliencia_da_Mobilidade_Urbana_Uma_Proposta_Conceitual>. (Acesso em 01/10/2016)

Fernandes, V. A.; R. Rothfuss; V. Hochschild; W. R. Silva e M. P. S. Santos (2017) Resiliência da mobilidade urbana: Uma pro-posta conceitual e de sistematização. Revista Transportes, v. 25, n. 4, p. 147-160. DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1079

Folke, C.; S. R. Carpender; B. Walker; M. Scheffer; T. Chapin e J. Rochström (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology & Society, v. 15, n. 4. Disponível em: <https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/>. (Acesso em 12/02/2017)

Hamidi, S. e R. Ewing (2015) Is sprawl affordable for Americans? Exploring the association between sprawl and housing + transportation affordability. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC. DOI: 10.3141/2500-09

Horning, J.; A. El-Geneidy e K. J. Krizek (2007) Perceptions of walking distance to neighbourhood retail and other public services. Transportation Research at McGill. Disponível em: <http://tram.mcgill.ca/Research/Publications/distance_perception.pdf>. (Acesso em 10/03/2017)

Hubbert, M. K. (1949) Energy from Fossil Fuels. Science, New Series, v. 109, n. 2823, p. 103-109. Disponível em: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1676618>. (Acesso 22/01/2017)

Hydén, C.; A. Nilsson e R. Risser (1999) How to enhance walking and cycling instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering. Disponível em: <https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/walcyng.pdf>. (Acesso 22/01/2017)

Larsen, J.; A. El-Geneid, e F. Yasmin (2010) Beyond the quarter mile: Re-examining travel distances by active transportation. Canadian Journal of Urban Research: Canadian Planning and Policy (supplement), v. 19, n. 1, p. 70-88. Disponível em: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26193275>. (Acesso 03/02/2017)

Lovelace, R. e I. Philips (2014) The “oil vulnerability” of commuter patterns: A case study from Yorkshire and the Humber, UK. Geoforum, v.51, p. 169-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.005

McCormack G. R.; E. Cerin; E. Leslie; L. Du Toit e N. Owen (2008) Objective versus perceived walking distances to destina-tions. Environment and Behavior, v. 40, n. 3. DOI: 10.1177/0013916507300560

Moudon, A. V.; C. Lee; A. D. Cheadle; G. Cheza; D. Johnson; T. L. Schmid; R. D. Weathers e L. Lin (2006) Operational definitions of walkable neighbourhood: theoretical and empirical insights. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, v. 3, n. 1, p. 99-117. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99

Newman, P. e J. Kenworthy (2011) ‘Peak Car Use’: Understanding the demise of automobile dependence. World Transport Policy and Practice, v. 17, n. 2, p. 31-42. Disponível em: <http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/23589>. (Acesso 22/01/2017)

Oliveira, A.; F. Tan e A. N. Rodrigues da Silva (2016) Adequação do modo de transporte: um indicador de mobilidade susten-tável em campus universitário. Anais do XXX Congresso Nacional de Pesquisa em Transporte da ANPET. Rio Janeiro, RJ, Bra-sil, p. 2703-2709. Disponível em: <http://anpet.org.br/xxxanpet/site/images/documentos/anais/7_Planejamento_Territorial_do_Transporte.pdf>. (Acesso 10/03/2017)

Philips, I. (2014) The potential role of walking and cycling to increase resilience of transport systems to future external shocks. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia). University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies. Leeds, UK. Disponível em: <http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/7349>. (Acesso 22/01/2017)

Rendall, S.; S. Page; F. Reitsma; E. Van Houten e S. Krumdieck (2011) Quantifying transport energy resilience: Active mode accessibility. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, n. 2242, p. 72-80. DOI: 10.3141/2242-09

Rodrigues da Silva, A. N.; G. C. F. Costa e N. C. M. Brondino (2007) Urban sprawl and energy use for transportation in the largest Brazilian cities. Energy for Sustainable Development, v. 11, n. 3, p. 44-50. DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60576-1

Saunders, M. J. e A. N. Rodrigues da Silva (2009) Reducing urban transport energy dependence: A new urban development framework and GIS-based tool. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, v. 3, n. 2, p. 71-87. DOI: 10.1080/1556831070164803.

Schwanen, T. (2016) Rethinking resilience as capacity to endure. City, v. 20, n. 1, p. 152-160. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125718

Shim, G. E.; S. M. Rhee; K. H. Ahn e S. B. Chung (2006). The relationship between the characteristics of transportation energy consumption and urban form. The Annals of Regional Science, v. 40, n. 2, p. 351-367. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-005-0051-5

Walker J. e M. Cooper (2011) Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, v. 42, n. 2, p. 143-160. DOI: 10.1177/0967010611399616

Yang, Y. e A. V. Diez-Roux (2012) Walking distance by trip purpose and population subgroups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, v. 43, n. 1, p. 11-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.015

Zhang, W. e K. M. Kockelman (2014) Urban sprawl, job decentralization, and congestion: the welfare effects of congestion tolls and urban growth boundaries. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting. Washington, DC. Disponível em: <https://trid.trb.org/view/1287979>. (Acesso 03/02/2017)

V. 26, N. 3, 2018 -- Prêmio ANPET de Produção Científica

Downloads

Published

2018-11-04

How to Cite

Martins, M. C. da M., & Rodrigues da Silva, A. N. (2018). Uma estratégia para avaliação da resiliência na mobilidade urbana. Transportes, 26(3), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v26i3.1625

Issue

Vol. 26 No. 3 (2018): Artigos vencedores do Prêmio ANPET 2017

Section

Prêmio ANPET de Produção Científica winners

License

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
  2. Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
  5. Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
  6. Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.