Analysis of track geometric evaluation methods for monitoring railway in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58922/transportes.v31i1.2824Keywords:
Railway, Track inspection, Track geometry, Track quality indexAbstract
Railways are an essential part of global logistics, being used as a fundamental and efficient means of transporting goods in the world's major economies (ANTF, 2022b). Railways need to be monitored to ensure safe operations and economical maintenance. Currently, inspections are performed automatically, usually by control cars that measure geometric parameters, using an index to represent it numerically. Different regulatory agencies have proposed several quality indices, such as European Railway Agency and FederalRailway Administration (FRA). There is no standardized method of track quality index for the Brazilian railways. In this way, the study sought to understand and apply the methods of geometric evaluation of the railway track from data collected in two Brazilian railways using the control car inspection equipment, in view of the need to understand the indices applied in railways of other countries. Track Quality Index (TQI) FRA, Standard Deviation (SD), TQI China Index, J Coefficient and Combined Standard Deviation (CoSD) were evaluated. In addition to verifying and discussing the methodologies applied in the railroads, a unique existing methodology to be applied in railroads in Brazil will be proposed through a case study. Using an adequate index can favor the definition of effective planning by railway maintenance management, enabling better control of the service life of the assets and, consequently, optimization of the resources. Therefore, a sample section was evaluated for the two railroads, with their respective classifications and quality levels according to the different methods available in the literature, to assess which methodology best represented the real condition of the railroad line of both railroads. With this, it was possible to understand better the characteristics of the parameters that involve the railroads, in addition to the understanding, comparison, and applicability of the different methods using the same set of information from the inspections carried out by rail track inspection vehicles. We suggest using the CoSD method considering the four parameters of track geometry described in technical standards (NBR 16387, 2020) until a more appropriate method is developed.
Downloads
References
ANTF (2022a) Carga Geral: Expansão Anual Média Chega a 4,2%. Disponível em: <https://www.antf.org.br/releases/cargageral/> (acesso em 10/02/2023).
ANTF (2022b) Informações Gerais. Disponível em: <https://www.antf.org.br/informacoes-gerais/> (acesso em 10/02/2023).
ANTT (2021) Anuário do Setor Ferroviário. Disponível em: <https://www.gov.br/antt/ptbr/assuntos/ferrovias/anuario-do-setor-ferroviario/> (acesso em 14/02/2023).
Bing, A.J. e A. Gross (1983) Development of railroad track degradation models, Transportation Research Record, v. 939, p. 27-31. Disponível em: <http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1983/939/939-005.pdf> (acesso em 13/02/2023).
CFR (2021) 49 CRF Ch. II (10–1–11 Edition). Disponível em: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title49-vol4/pdf/CFR-2011-title49-vol4-part213.pdf> (acesso em 13/02/2023).
EN 13848-5 (2008) Railway Applications -Track- Track Geometry Quality - Part 5: Geometric Quality Assessment. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
EN 13848-6 (2014) Railway Applications — Track — Track Geometry Quality Part 6 : Characterisation of Track Geometry Quality, Standard. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
Esveld, C. (1993) In track quality control and assessment of rails. In Kalker J.J., D.F. Cannon e O. Orringer (eds.) Rail Quality and Maintenance for Modern Railway Operation. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8151-6_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8151-6_12
Esveld, C. (2001) Modern Railway Track (2nd ed.). Zaltbommel: MRT-Productions.
Farkas, A. (2019) Measurement of railway track geometry: a state-of-the-art review. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, v. 48, n. 1, p. 76-88. DOI: 10.3311/PPtr.14145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.14145
Federal Railroad Administration (2005) Development of Objective Track Quality Indices. Washington: Federal Railroad Administration. Disponível em: https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/development-objective-track-quality-indices (acesso em 23/03/2023).
Krug, G. e J. Madejski (2018) Improving track condition by application of Quasi Cumulative Distribution Function (QCDF). Road and Rail Infrastructure V, v. 5, p. 659-66. DOI: 10.5592/CO/CETRA.2018.749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5592/CO/CETRA.2018.749
Li, D.; J.P. Hyslip; T.R. Sussmann et al. (2016) Railway Geotechnics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b18982
Liu, R.K.; P. Xu; Z. Sun et al. (2015) Establishment of track quality index standard recommendations for beijing metro. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, v. 2015, p. 473830. DOI: 10.1155/2015/473830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/473830
Melo, A.L.O.; S. Kaewunruen; M. Papaelias et al. (2020) Methods to monitor and evaluate the deterioration of track and its components in a railway in-service: a systemic review. Frontiers in Built Environment, v. 6, p. 118. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2020.00118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00118
NBR 16387 (2020) Via férrea — Classificação de Vias. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.
Ngamkhanong, C.; S. Kaewunruen e B.J.A. Costa (2018) State-of-the-art review of railway track resilience monitoring. Infrastructures, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures3010003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures3010003
NSW 205 (2018) Technical Note – TN 025: 2018 Subject: Update to ESC 210 Track Geometry. NSW Government: Transport Asset Strandards Authority.
Offenbacher, S.; J. Neuhold; P. Veit et al. (2020) Analyzing major track quality indices and introducing a universally applicable tqi. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 10, n. 23, p. 1-17. DOI: 10.3390/app10238490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238490
Rosyidi, S.A. e D. Setiawan (2016) Track quality index as track quality. In Proceeding of the 19th International Symposium of Indonesian Inter-University Transportation Studies Forum (FSTPT). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, p. 197-207.
Sadeghi, J. e H. Askarinejad (2010) Development of improved railway track degradation models. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, v. 6, n. 6, p. 675-88. DOI: 10.1080/15732470801902436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470801902436
Sgavioli, F.; L. Bernucci; R. Motta et al. (2015) Análise do custo do ciclo de vida do lastro ferroviário na estrada de ferro Vitória Minas. Transportes, v. 23, n. 4, p. 5. DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v23i4.981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v23i4.981
Tzanakakis, K. (2013) The Railway Track and Its Long Term Behaviour (1st ed.). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36051-0
Yan, T.H. e F. Corman (2020) Assessing and extending track quality index for novel measurement techniques in railway systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, v. 2674, n. 8, p. 24-36. DOI: 10.1177/0361198120923661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120923661
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Angelo Samuel Junqueira, Rosângela dos Santos Motta, Luciano Oliveira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
- Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
- Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
