Desafios e perspectivas para avaliação e melhoria da mobilidade urbana sustentável: um estudo comparativo de municípios brasileiros

Authors

  • Gláucia Maia de Oliveira Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos - Universidade de São Paulo
  • Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos - Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v23i1.768

Keywords:

sustainable urban mobility, indicators, mobility planning.

Abstract

The general objective of this study was the identification of challenges and perspectives for the evaluation and improvement of sustainable urban mobility, based on three analyses of the following cities: Belém, Curitiba, Goiânia, Juazeiro, Uberlândia, and Itajubá. The first analysis was a comparison of the actual mobility conditions found in six cities selected in the five Brazilian regions, which were assessed with the Index of Sustainable Urban Mobility (I_SUM). Next, a strategy for evaluating and selecting actions for promoting sustainable mobility was applied to the same cities and the results compared. Finally, the outcomes of the two evaluations were comparatively analyzed. Although a clear relationship between performance and viability has been found, the possibility of identifying when performance and viability are not clearly related (for example, when indicators with low performance are highly feasible for improvement), is also important. That condition may provide an opportunity for the improvement of sustainable urban mobility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASSUNÇÃO, M. A. (2012) Indicadores de Mobilidade Urbana Sustentável para a Cidade de Uberlândia, MG. Dissertação (Mestrado). Faculdade de Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia. http://www.ppgec.feciv.ufu.br/node/329.

AZEVEDO FILHO, M. A. N. (2012) Análise do Processo de Planejamento dos Transportes como Contribuição para a Mobili-dade Urbana sustentável. Tese (Doutorado). Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde-1112201

-091904/.

BLACK, J. A.; PAEZ, A.; SUTHANAYA, P.A. (2002) Sustain-able Urban Transportation: Performance Indicators and Some Analytical Approaches. Journal of Urban Planning and Devel-opment, v. 128, n. 4, p. 184-209. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)07339488(2002)128:4(184).

BRASIL. (2012) Lei no 12.587, de 03 de janeiro de 2012. Institui as Diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana e dá outras providências. Brasília. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato20112014/2012/lei/l12587.htm.

COSTA, M. S. (2008) Um Índice de Mobilidade Urbana Susten-tável. Tese (Doutorado). Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde-01112008-200521/ .

CURTIS, C. e LOW, N. (2012) Institutional Barriers to Sustain-able Transport. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey.

GUDMUNDSSON, H. (2001) Indicators and Performance Measures for Transportation, Environment and Sustainability in North America. Relatório do German Marshall Fund Fellowship 2000. Individual Study Tour October 2000. Research Notes n. 148.

http://www2.dmu.dk/1_Viden/2_Publikationer/3_abraporter/rapporter/AR148.pdf.

GUDMUNDSSON, H. (2004) Sustainable Transport and Per-formance Indicators, In: HESTER, R.E. & HARRISON, R.M. (eds), Transport and the Environment - Issues in Environmental Science and Technology, n. 20, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge-UK, p. 35-63. http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:22485/datastreams/file_981cc12d-1a6a-4a0c-94b6-6ecf0e650669/content.

IPEA. (2011) A Nova Lei de Diretrizes da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana. (Comunicados do IPEA). Instituto de Pes-quisa Econômica Aplicada, Brasília. http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/comunicado/120106_comunicadoipea128.pdf.

LIKERT, R. A. (1932) A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, v. 140, n. 1, p. 1-55. http://www.voteview.com/Likert_1932.pdf.

LITMAN, T. e BURWELL, D. (2006) Issues in Sustainable Transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, v. 6, n. 4, p. 331-347. http://www.vtpi.org/sus_iss.pdf.

LITMAN, T. (2011) Well measured - Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Victoria. http://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf.

MANCINI, M. T. (2011) Planejamento Urbano Baseado em Cenários de Mobilidade Sustentável. Dissertação (Mestrado). Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos da Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde14062011-174919/ .

MIRANDA, H. F. (2010) Mobilidade Urbana Sustentável e o Caso de Curitiba. Dissertação (Mestrado). Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde03052011-103404/ .

MIRANDA, H. F. e RODRIGUES DA SILVA, A. N. (2012) Benchmarking Sustainable Urban Mobility: The Case of Curitiba, Brazil. Transport Policy, v. 21, p. 141-151. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.009.

MIRANDA, H. F.; MANCINI, M. T.; AZEVEDO FILHO, M. A. N. D.; ALVES, V. F. B.; RODRIGUES DA SILVA, A. N. (2009) Barreiras para a Implantação de Planos de Mobilidade. In: XXIII ANPET - Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes, Vitória. ANPET, p. 1-12.

MORAIS, T. C. (2012) Avaliação e Seleção de Alternativas para a Promoção da Mobilidade Urbana Sustentável - O Caso de Anápolis, Goiás. Dissertação (Mestrado). Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18144/tde-07022013-164654/.

NICOLAS, J. P.; POCHET, P.; POIMBOEUF, H. (2003) To-wards Sustainable Mobility Indicators: Application to the Lyons Conurbation. Transport Policy, v. 10, n. 3, p. 197-208. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00021-0.

RICHARDSON, B. C. (2005) Sustainable Transport: Analysis Frameworks. Journal of Transport Geography, n. 13, 29-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.005.

RODRIGUES DA SILVA, A. N.; AZEVEDO FILHO, M. A. N.; MACEDO, M. H.; SORRATINI, J. A.; SILVA, A. F.; LIMA, J. P. E PINHEIRO, A. M. G. S. (2015) A Comparative Evaluation of Mobility Conditions in Selected Cities of the Five Brazilian Regions. Transport Policy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 147-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.017.

RODRIGUES DA SILVA, A. N. (2013) Institutional Barriers to Sustainable Transport, C. Curtis, N. Low. Journal of Transport Geography. (Book Review). DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.04.

RODRIGUES DA SILVA, A. N.; COSTA, M. S.; MACEDO, M. H. (2008) Multiple Views of Sustainable Urban Mobility - The Case of Brazil. Transport Policy, v. 15, n. 6, p. 350-360.DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.003.

UN-HABITAT. (2013) Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Global Report on Human Settlements 2013, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Nairobi: UN-Habitat, Abingdon [etc.]: Earthscan from Routledge. http://unhabitat.org/planning-and-design-for-sustainable-urban-mobility-global-report-on-human-settlements-2013/.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-12

How to Cite

Oliveira, G. M. de, & Rodrigues da Silva, A. N. (2015). Desafios e perspectivas para avaliação e melhoria da mobilidade urbana sustentável: um estudo comparativo de municípios brasileiros. Transportes, 23(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v23i1.768

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
  2. Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
  5. Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
  6. Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.